In times of multiple crises, the debate over a reform of § 218 StGB, which regulates abortion in Germany, requires well-considered arguments. Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Michael Kubiciel questions the necessity of such reforms and sheds light on their potential constitutional barriers. Kubiciel's observations reveal that the legislation established in 1995, based on a compromise that decriminalises abortion under certain conditions, has not only contributed to a reduction in the number of terminations but also prevented the criminalisation of women and doctors.
These regulations reflect the complex moral and ethical dimensions of the issue by respecting both the reproductive autonomy of the woman and the protection of unborn life. Kubiciel emphasises the crucial role of the criminal code in protecting fundamental rights, including the right to life, and cautions against underestimating the importance of the existing compromise. Neither from a criminal policy nor from a constitutional perspective are there compelling reasons for changing the existing regulations, highlighting the importance of compromises for democratic cohesion and societal harmony.
Please note, to date the paper is only available in German.
Topics
About this series
The Monitor series deals with one main topic at a time from the perspective of KAS experts and places it in the political and social context on the basis of a few key points.
Ordering Information
The contributions appear exclusively online and can therefore not be ordered.
The current main topics are “Development policy”, “Sustainability” and “Election and social research”. The contributions of these sub-series are presented for you on separate overview pages in addition to the overall series.