With only five official negotiation days left before the World Health Assembly (WHA) in May—where the agreement is set to be adopted—delegations are under immense time pressure.
Freedom, justice and solidarity are the basic principles underlying the work of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS). The KAS is a political foundation, closely associated with the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU).
Multipod: WHO macht Fortschritte bei internationalen Gesundheitsvorschriften
Die Covid-Pandemie hat auch auf internationaler Ebene Folgen. Erfahren Sie, wie die Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) und ihre Mitgliedstaaten sich besser für die Zukunft wappnen.
Or adjust your cookie settings under privacy policy.
Statement
Norbert Lammert on the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
"Human rights are not laws of nature. [...], they must be protected & defended by people who take the claim to the inviolability of human dignity seriously".
Multipod: Review of Germany in the UPR
Multipod: Human rights protection starts at home. Germany in the UPR
On 9th November 2023, the United Nation's Human Rights Council discussed the human rights situation in Germany
Or adjust your cookie settings under privacy policy.
Genfreise
Geneva Security Debate zum Krieg in der Ukraine
Prof. Dr. Lammert, Botschafter Dr. Heusgen und Botschafter Greminger zu den Auswirkungen des Krieges in der Ukraine auf den Multilateralismus und die Weltordnung
Delegationsreise
Dialogprogramm des Arbeitskreises Globale Gesundheit der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung in Genf
Erfahren Sie mehr über die Delegationsreise zu aktuellen Herausforderungen im Bereich Globale Gesundheit vom 7-9. Juni
U.S. Mission / Eric Bridiers / flickr / CC BY-ND 2.0
Die Bedeutung des WHO-Pandemieabkommens für wirtschaftliche Sicherheit und Gesundheitsschutz in Deuts...
Dr. Anja Maria Rittner
March 27, 2025
Country reports
U.S. Mission / Eric Bridiers / flickr / CC BY-ND 2.0
Geneva Telegram on the 13th meeting of the INB - A crucial moment for the pandemic response
The "Geneva Telegram" deals with events in Geneva's multilateral organizations on a current topic, this time the 13th meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body on the Pandem...
Dr. Anja Maria Rittner
February 24, 2025
Geneva Telegram
UN Photo/Jean-Marc Ferré
What a second Trump Administration will mean for multilateralism, in particular International Geneva
Andrea Ellen Ostheimer
January 13, 2025
Geneva Telegram
Flickr/UN Geneva/CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
Geneva Barometer
Developments among Geneva-based international organisations from September to December 2024
Andrea Ellen Ostheimer, Sarah Ultes, Dr. Anja Maria Rittner, Cedric Amon
December 23, 2024
Genfer Großwetterlage
Fast, but not fast-tracked
Mitglieder der Welthandelsorganisation (WTO) bestätigen WTO-Generaldirektorin, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala für eine zweite Amtszeit
Votes on Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine on 24 February 2025 in UN General Assembly and UN Security Council
Map of the Month 02/205
Three years after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the UN General Assembly had to vote on two different resolutions instead of a single text on 24 February 2025. The first resolution (L.10) was tabled by Ukraine and European countries and was largely based on a resolution with agreed language dating back to February 2023. Back then it was adopted by a large majority of 141 votes in favour, 7 against and 32 abstentions. The resolution that has now been submitted, however, was only adopted with 93 votes in favour, 18 against and 65 abstentions. For the first time, the USA also voted against the text and even introduced an alternative text (L.11), which omitted mention of Russian aggression. This meant a fundamental shift of position. The US-submitted resolution was also adopted in the General Assembly, but only in an amended form, as three European amendments were adopted. On the other hand, the USA pushed through its original version of the text in the UN Security Council just a few hours later. The European amendments were not taken on board. They were either outvoted or rejected by a Russian veto. The maps provide an insight into the votes on the respective resolutions as well as the European and Russian amendments.
Sarah Ultes
February 25, 2025
Map of the Month
Support for 37th Special Session of UN Human Rights Council on situation in the east of the DRC
Map of the Month 02/2025
At the request of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and with support of 27 Member States as well as 21 Observer States, the UN Human Rights Council convened its 37th Special Session on the human rights situation in the east of the DRC on the 7th of February. The Council adopted a resolution without a vote in which it condemned in the strongest possible terms the human rights violations and abuses being committed in the provinces of North and South Kivu, the unlawful exploitation and looting of natural resources therein as well as the military and logistical support provided by the Rwanda Defence Force to the M23. It decided to urgently establish an international fact-finding mission to investigate and establish the facts, circumstances and root causes of all alleged violations and abuses, collect, consolidate and analyse all evidence, identify persons and entities responsible, make recommendations on accountability and present a first oral update in the 59th Council session in September 2025. It also established an Independent Commission of Inquiry to Continue the work of the Fact-Finding Mission.
Sarah Ultes
February 7, 2025
Map of the Month
Voting behaviour in line with Germany’s and China's positioning in the UN Human Rights Council 2024
Map of the Month 01/2025
The map of the month January illustrates the voting behaviour of the members of the Human Rights Council in line with Germany’s versus China's positioning in the Council in 2024. A total of 91 resolutions were adopted in the UN Human Rights Council last year, 25 of which were put to a vote due to a lack of consensus. In addition to the EU member states, the USA, Montenegro, Japan, Finland and Albania voted most frequently in line with Germany (over 80%); Algeria never did so and Bangladesh, Burundi, Cameroon, China, Eritrea and Sudan only once. Of the Central and South American Council members, Argentina, Paraguay, Costa Rica and Chile voted most frequently in line with Germany (just over 55%); of the African states, Malawi, Ghana and Gambia (just over 35%). By contrast, Eritrea, Cuba and Burundi voted in line with China most frequently, while Albania, Argentina, Bulgaria and the USA never voted with China, and Germany, Lithuania, the Netherlands and Romania hardly ever (4%). China and Germany only voted together once: they supported a text on the Palestinian people's right to self-determination, which the USA rejected.
Sarah Ultes
January 29, 2025
Map of the Month
Contributions of WHO member states to the first WHO Investment Round
Map of the Month 12/2024
The WHO Investment Round, initiated by the "Sustainable Finance Working Group", is a new pillar to secure sustainable, predictable and flexible funding for the WHO, complementing the gradual increase in assessed contributions.
Between May and November 2024, the first-ever Investment Round raised 3.8 billion USD (53% of the 7.1 billion target) from 53 member states and 16 philantrophy, private sector, or multilateral entities. Only member states and the European Union are shown here.
For 2025-2028, the WHO's General Program of Work (GPW) requires 11.1 billion USD in total funding, of which 4 billion USD will come from assessed contributions. This approach aims to address critical health needs while ensuring financial sustainability and accountability.
The 13th meeting of the INB - A crucial moment for the pandemic response
With only five official negotiation days left before the World Health Assembly (WHA) in May—where the agreement is set to be adopted—delegations are under immense time pressure.