Asset Publisher

Adobe Stock / Artlana; generiert mit KI

Single title

AI and Elections: New dynamics of digital democracy in Germany

by Dr. Katja Muñoz, Emma Laumann

Opportunities and risks for our democratic order through AI in the super election year 2024

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionising the election campaign. Between innovation and manipulation, the integrity of democratic processes is being put to the test. AI is also marking a new era of political communication in Germany: while parties such as the AfD are using AI for emotionalising messages, others such as Volt are using data-driven strategies for mobilisation. The risks of the technology range from disinformation to the fragmentation of public discourse. What regulatory measures are needed to ensure trust and transparency in the digital age?

Asset Publisher

The year 2024 marks a turning point for digital political communication in Germany: for the first time, artificial intelligence (AI) plays a decisive role in election campaigns. This development offers opportunities to promote democratic innovations and citizen participation but also poses significant risks, such as disinformation and the fragmentation of political discourse. This study comprehensively examines the dynamics and implications of AI usage in the political context, particularly in the European elections and state elections.

The German media landscape has undergone profound changes in recent years due to the growing influence of social media and algorithmically curated content. AI technologies such as deepfakes, chatbots, and generative models enable political actors to achieve unprecedented precision and reach in targeting their audiences. Parties like the AfD, in particular, use AI strategically to amplify emotional messages, spark controversial debates, and expand their online presence. At the same time, the party exploits vulnerabilities in social media platforms by leveraging algorithms to disseminate polarising content. These developments raise pressing questions about transparency, regulation, and the ethical boundaries of AI use.

In contrast, smaller parties like Volt demonstrate how AI can be effectively used as a tool for data-driven strategies to save resources and mobilise new voter groups. However, the analysis also highlights the potential dangers of insufficiently labelled AI-generated content, which can manipulate public debate and erode trust in democratic processes.

The study identifies regulatory gaps and proposes concrete measures to safeguard the integrity of democratic elections. A multi-stakeholder approach, clear labelling guidelines, and heightened public awareness of the risks associated with AI in political communication are essential. Developing a binding "Code of Conduct" for political parties and rigorously enforcing existing platform policies are additional key recommendations.

The findings underscore that the use of AI in political communication is a double-edged sword: while the technology offers innovative ways to strengthen democratic processes, it can also endanger the foundations of a functioning democracy through manipulative practices and fragmented information spaces. The future design of regulatory frameworks will be critical in ensuring that the potential of AI is used responsibly, and its risks are minimised.

Read the entire publication: ‘KI und Wahlen: Neue Dynamiken der digitalen Demokratie in Deutschland’ here as a PDF. Please note, to date the analysis is only available in German.

Asset Publisher

Contact

Ferdinand Alexander Gehringer

Ferdinand Alexander Gehringer

Homeland and cyber security

ferdinand.gehringer@kas.de +49 30 26996 3709
Contact

Marcel Schepp

Marcel Schepp

International Party Dialogue

marcel.schepp@kas.de +49 30 26996-3499

comment-portlet

Asset Publisher

Media library

Rule of Law Rules Podcast

#11: Hannah Lim on Legal Technology in South East Asia

As Head of Rule of Law and Emerging Markets at LexisNexis in Singapore, Hannah identifies areas where LexisNexis can, leveraging on technology, support the rule of law.

read now
Rule of Law Rules Podcast

#6: Lee San Natalie Pang on the General Data Protection Regulation & its influence in Southeast Asia

For the last episode of our first series “Data Protection” we go to Asia and take a closer look at the Southeast with Dr Lee San Natalie Pang, our expert on Data Protection.

read now
Rule of Law Rules Podcast

#5: Ridwan Oloyede about the GDPR and its influence in African legal framework

Ridwan Oloyede is co-founder of a Nigerian start-up, that helps businesses to achieve operational excellence through the reliable and efficient application of technology.

read now
Rule of Law Rules Podcast

#4: Nadim Gemayel on the General Data Protection Regulation and its influence in Middle East

Nadim Gemayel is a politician and lawyer based in Lebanon and Qatar. He was a member of the Lebanese Parliament between 2009 and 2020.

read now
Rule of Law Rules Podcast

#3: Eduardo Magrani on Data Protection in Latin America

We speak with Eduardo Magrani about the General Data Protection Regulation and its influence in Brazilian and Latin American legal framework.

read now
Rule of Law Rules Podcast

#2: Ioana Stupariu on the GDPR's influence in South East Europe

Ioana Stupariu works with tech and healthcare start-ups and companies across Central and Eastern Europe. And she researches on Data protection & Privacy.

read now
Rule of Law Rules Podcast

#1: Frederick Richter on the the EU’s GDPR and data protection worldwide

We look at the EU’s GDPR: How is data protection handled in other parts of the world? How can we establish international standards? And what will happen next?

read now

Asset Publisher